2:22PM EDT
Happy Equinox!
Mundane:
Finally I got the links inside my blogs to work, but this funky blogger html is confusing me.
Cleaning/vacuuming done, m fed, ASM prep work done, transcripts requested, bills paid, Wilbur watered, beer bottles washed, blog fixed. I haven’t decided if I’ve been really productive this morning or creatively procrastinating. You decide.
Two Rants: (Ignore if you’re not a Colgate student)
1. The new UPS electronic system at the coop. Has anyone else noticed that the package line is exponentially longer now. Further, when webmail went down with the Nimda virus this week, email notifications weren’t sent out and there were not paper slips in your mailbox anymore. They held my contacts hostage for four days! And this is painful mind you seeing that I had to make 2 week disposable contacts last 7.4 weeks. But nonetheless, it takes the mailroom people five minutes per package to figure out how to use the little digital signing machine. Just let me sign the clipboard like before!
2. Dammit, I forgot. And I had three rants to begin with too. No worries, I’m sure I’ll remember sometime. Oh yeah: Sushi at the coop. You know the “good to go” section. There are some things they just shouldn’t attempt; Sushi is one of them. And bring back by turkey clubs!
Sacredness:
Religion majors are cool. There is just something about taking religion courses that opens your eyes to the world. Unfortunately I am not a religion major {grumbles about f*cking physics} but I did burn my electives this summer and took a few religion courses at BU this summer. I am kicking myself for having not brought my eastern religion books out to school with me, for I have an overwhelming urge to re-read the Bhagavad-Gita at the moment. But this is why I have religion major friends. And I stumbled into a friend last night who is a prospective religion major. Good conversation ensued. I enjoy discussing religion, MOST of the time. (one day I have to start telling my bible thumpers stories) Anyways my night rocked: show went swimmingly, still saw Wood’s Tea, beer, good friends, good convo! Why am I telling you this? Because an idea came up that has been cooking in my head for the last 12 hours.
Yes, I’m getting to the point….
So sacredness: The context is discussing the implications of doctrine and lack of doctrine in Western and Eastern religions respectively. What came out of that was that only nature is sacred. At first I agreed with this without reservation, but it was late. I think the concept cooked in my head overnight. Come to think of it, I don’t know if I’ve ever really contemplated what is sacred through my eyes. I have done a lot of introspection into my own spirituality over the past three years or so, but I don’t think I’ve ever sat down and thought about sacredness. Keep in mind that this is a perspective that has fully matured in my mind yet, nonetheless, I’m beginning to think that the original statement that only nature is sacred needs amending.
Is all nature sacred? What do we mean by nature. Can that be termed as virgin land/space, or do gardens or other man-sculpted landscaping qualify? Or are we talking about nature in the sense of a governing force over the world/universe in which we live? Does this nature include man? On the flip side: is something that has been polluted or otherwise spoiled by man unable to be sacred? Does man’s presence simply negate this sacred quality or does it depend on the intent of the man?
I think I have many more questions than answers to this thought problem. I am, however, leaning towards defining nature (if it even should be defined) as the governing force. The string that holds everything together. That defines the laws of physics and creates phenonmenon. That provides both order, as is the case recently, disorder amongst the mundane. That ineffable concept that makes this work/happen/be. I think that it’s partially this ineffability that helps make nature sacred. Hmmm…. Feel free to chime in here.
So this leads me to the next question (even though I haven’t answered the first): how well can we understand sacredness? Does understanding it negate it? Can it be comprehended, or is it more like Schroedinger’s cat.
Appropriate concept to ponder on the equinox.
2:59PM
Happy Equinox!
Mundane:
Finally I got the links inside my blogs to work, but this funky blogger html is confusing me.
Cleaning/vacuuming done, m fed, ASM prep work done, transcripts requested, bills paid, Wilbur watered, beer bottles washed, blog fixed. I haven’t decided if I’ve been really productive this morning or creatively procrastinating. You decide.
Two Rants: (Ignore if you’re not a Colgate student)
1. The new UPS electronic system at the coop. Has anyone else noticed that the package line is exponentially longer now. Further, when webmail went down with the Nimda virus this week, email notifications weren’t sent out and there were not paper slips in your mailbox anymore. They held my contacts hostage for four days! And this is painful mind you seeing that I had to make 2 week disposable contacts last 7.4 weeks. But nonetheless, it takes the mailroom people five minutes per package to figure out how to use the little digital signing machine. Just let me sign the clipboard like before!
2. Dammit, I forgot. And I had three rants to begin with too. No worries, I’m sure I’ll remember sometime. Oh yeah: Sushi at the coop. You know the “good to go” section. There are some things they just shouldn’t attempt; Sushi is one of them. And bring back by turkey clubs!
Sacredness:
Religion majors are cool. There is just something about taking religion courses that opens your eyes to the world. Unfortunately I am not a religion major {grumbles about f*cking physics} but I did burn my electives this summer and took a few religion courses at BU this summer. I am kicking myself for having not brought my eastern religion books out to school with me, for I have an overwhelming urge to re-read the Bhagavad-Gita at the moment. But this is why I have religion major friends. And I stumbled into a friend last night who is a prospective religion major. Good conversation ensued. I enjoy discussing religion, MOST of the time. (one day I have to start telling my bible thumpers stories) Anyways my night rocked: show went swimmingly, still saw Wood’s Tea, beer, good friends, good convo! Why am I telling you this? Because an idea came up that has been cooking in my head for the last 12 hours.
Yes, I’m getting to the point….
So sacredness: The context is discussing the implications of doctrine and lack of doctrine in Western and Eastern religions respectively. What came out of that was that only nature is sacred. At first I agreed with this without reservation, but it was late. I think the concept cooked in my head overnight. Come to think of it, I don’t know if I’ve ever really contemplated what is sacred through my eyes. I have done a lot of introspection into my own spirituality over the past three years or so, but I don’t think I’ve ever sat down and thought about sacredness. Keep in mind that this is a perspective that has fully matured in my mind yet, nonetheless, I’m beginning to think that the original statement that only nature is sacred needs amending.
Is all nature sacred? What do we mean by nature. Can that be termed as virgin land/space, or do gardens or other man-sculpted landscaping qualify? Or are we talking about nature in the sense of a governing force over the world/universe in which we live? Does this nature include man? On the flip side: is something that has been polluted or otherwise spoiled by man unable to be sacred? Does man’s presence simply negate this sacred quality or does it depend on the intent of the man?
I think I have many more questions than answers to this thought problem. I am, however, leaning towards defining nature (if it even should be defined) as the governing force. The string that holds everything together. That defines the laws of physics and creates phenonmenon. That provides both order, as is the case recently, disorder amongst the mundane. That ineffable concept that makes this work/happen/be. I think that it’s partially this ineffability that helps make nature sacred. Hmmm…. Feel free to chime in here.
So this leads me to the next question (even though I haven’t answered the first): how well can we understand sacredness? Does understanding it negate it? Can it be comprehended, or is it more like Schroedinger’s cat.
Appropriate concept to ponder on the equinox.
2:59PM
